Check the winners The Grow Awards 2026 🏆

What Is Cannabis White Ash And How To Get It

Gemaakt door
JoshuaHoltJoshuaHolt
6 opmerkingen
Toegevoegd 7 November 2020

What Is Cannabis White Ash And How To Get It

Many claim that white ash is a sign of clean, chemical-free weed. On the other hand, dark ash is frowned upon for the unpleasant smoke it delivers. After much debate and testing, it could be said that the answer lies in the flush and cure. This article discusses white ash and how to get your joints burning smoothly.

What is White Ash?

Burning Cannabis Produces Ash

The definition of white ash is pretty self explanatory, but why is it important? White ash is the result of combusting cannabis buds that supposedly have been properly flushed and cured. In theory, the ash should be on the whiter side if the buds are clean.

It may be that you burnt some weed one day and the ash was dark, hard and crackled big time. The likelihood is that the weed was fed heavy amounts of chemical nutrients and not flushed or cured properly before harvesting. Of course, there are many affecting factors when it comes to determining the quality of your weed, but the colour of the ash can be one of them.

Bad Quality Weed

Dark Ash Is A Sign Of Bad Quality Weed

When the ash is dark and hard there could be something wrong with the bud. Growers use all kinds of chemical products to boost their weed. It may increase yields for them, but the final product is less than satisfying and potentially harmful for us.

When weed is very heavily fertilised, or even sprayed with chemicals (weirdly enough, some people do that), the ash will show it. Sometimes the tainted bud is so bad the ash goes solid as well as being on the dark side. Headaches and panic attacks are some of the reported effects of very overfertilized or sprayed buds. Fortunately, if you buy from a reputable source this is never really an issue, but just be careful where you get your weed from. 

Growing your own is often the best way to ensure the quality of your weed. If your buds do burn dark, it does not necessarily mean that is a sign of bad quality weed. However, it may mean harvesting was not completed correctly. In most cases the flush and cure do tend to make a positive difference to the final product. Let's take a look.

The Importance Of Flushing

Flushed Cannabis Plant

The topic of flushing has been widely discussed and there are growers who do not believe the process to be an important step in determining the quality of their weed. There are many variables when it comes to flushing and it does not always have to be performed in the same way. The important thing to understand is that flushing is more about cleaning the soil than literally taking out nutrients stored in the buds.

How heavily a grower chooses to flush depends on how the weed was grown. For example, an organic grow using compost and super soils does not benefit from flushing because there are no chemicals used in the growth process. There would probably be quite a difference in the colour of the ash if one was to burn an organic bud next to one that has been fed chemical nutrients until harvest day.

To give you a quick idea, flushing is performed with the intention to flush out any built up minerals, primarily around the root zone. Removing the nutrients from the soil prevents the plant from absorbing more and encourages it to feed off what is left stored in its reserves. 

Flushing normally involves giving plants a thorough watering at the beginning of the process to 'wash' out excess nutrients from around the roots. This is not entirely necessary but can help to kick start the flushing cycle.

Feeding

Soil Flush (Days)

Hydro Flush (Days)

None

0

0

Light

7

3

Medium

14

5

Heavy

21

7

Alternatively, if you don't feel your plants need a heavy flush, one can simply stick to a watering schedule until harvest. That means just giving plants water as and when they need it. Cannabis plants tend to start drinking less as they mature. It's a good sign the plant no longer needs further external nutrients.

There are many arguments against flushing and many growers believe it does not make a difference to the colour of the ash. If you're still unsure whether flushing helps to achieve a whiter ash, why not put it to the test? Grow two of the same strain, one on a light feed and the other on a heavier nutrient schedule. Flush the first plant and not the second. Dry and cure them in the same way and see what the outcome is.

Curing For A Cleaner Smoke

Curing Helps To Improve The Quality Of Your Buds

White ash is also considered to be the result of properly cured weed. It is well known in the growing community that drying and curing is crucial to achieve a flavourful, potent product.

When we dry and cure our weed correctly, the remaining sugars continue being metabolised. These compounds break down slowly and are released gradually into the atmosphere. It seems without them, the smoothness of the smoke improves noticeably.

The key here is to not dry and cure your buds too quickly. When this happens, some of the heavier compounds may remain in the bud (such as chlorophyll and other sugars) as they do not have enough time to break down, essentially becoming locked in the bud. Because of this, buds that have been fast-dried may deliver a harsh smoke that has a grassy taste.

The moisture content in the bud could be linked to the colour of the ash. If the buds still hold too much moisture then they may not burn properly (and at a lower temperature) and the ash is likely to be darker unless the weed is heated for a longer period of time. 

Drying and curing does help to remove some of the impurities left in the buds, and in theory, results in a whiter ash when burnt. Unfortunately, we still do not know the exact reason for white ash and it is probably a combination of factors, but curing does show significant improvement in bud quality.

Burning Cannabis Buds

Your Materials Affect The Colour Of 'Ash'

The colour of ash may also depend on how the plant material burns. For example, when the material burns at a higher temperature for longer periods of time, the ash tends to be whiter. The drier the material, the hotter it will burn.

Pure white ash essentially means there is no carbon left. Carbon based plant matter burns dark when it combusts (think of charcoal) but if you keep burning it will eventually turn white. The carbon eventually breaks down, leaving just some basic minerals which form a light, white ash.

Charcoal Turns White Once The Carbon Has Burnt Off

It could be said then, that if the mineral content is still high in the plant when it is burnt, the minerals that remain in the ash could be higher if the burning temperature is not hot enough. Dark ash may be because the weed was not able to fully combust as it was burning.

You also need to consider :

  • What materials you use to smoke
  • How dense you pack your bowls or joints
  • The way you heat the weed
  • For how long the weed is heated

Resin and other substances may get left behind in the ash when the product does not burn correctly. That's why you can usually relight a bowl of 'black' ash and still get a hit.

Rainbow Chip by Rocksfarm from GrowDiaries

Tip: It is important to note that vaping does not combust the buds. If that happens then you are smoking and the plant material will turn to ash. Vaped weed is decarboxylated and looks brown and crispy afterwards.

Conclusion

In the end, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that white ash means the final product is of a higher quality than a bud that produces dark ash. However, it is very common to hear that dark ash is not pleasant. This is why we suggest taking the time to flush and cure your weed, because the difference is more than noticeable.

If you found this article useful or have any comments about white/black ash, please leave a comment down below!

External References

An Investigation Of Decarboxylation Of Acidic Cannabinoids: THCA-A, CBDA And CBGA. Planta Medica. - Wang, Mei & Wang, Yan-Hong & Avula, Bharathi & Radwan, Mohamed & Wanas, Amira & Antwerp, J & Parcher, J & ElSohly, MA & Khan, Iftikhar. (2016)

Heavy Metal Soil Contamination and Bioremediation. - Muzafar, Malik & Goyal, Pooja & Gupta, AJAI & Gupta, Suphla. (2020).

This article was updated October 2020.




Inloggen

6 opmerkingen
Sorteer op
populariteit
populariteit
nieuwste
oudste
NorthernFrostCannabis
NorthernFrostCannabis gecommentarieerd6y ago
Flushing... Ik zal een aantal punten opsommen die niet alleen de absurde onpraktischheid en onlogica van deze mythe uitdagen, maar ook aantonen hoe de pseudowetenschap erachter fundamenteel gebrekkig is (zoals alle pseudowetenschap) en weerlegd kan worden door wat bekend is over de basisplantbiologie. 1. Planten beroven van essentiële voedingsstoffen in welke fase van hun levenscyclus dan ook is NIET voordelig voor de groei. Ik daag iedereen uit om een enkele peer-reviewed paper van een gerenommeerd tijdschrift te presenteren die bewijs levert dat anders suggereert. 2. Als dit praktisch was, zou je dan niet verwachten dat alle grote agrarische hydroponische telers dezelfde praktijk aannemen? 3. Planten nemen mineralen op in hun weefsels, vanuit hun wortels via de xylemelementen; d.w.z. xyleem. Zodra deze mineralen in de plant zijn, blijven ze daar, de plant stoot ze niet af, tenzij het gaat om senescentie-gedreven abscissie van bladstelen. Vanuit de xylemelementen worden voedingsstoffen getransporteerd naar het floëem - de 'bloedvoorziening' van de plant - nadat ze zijn geïntegreerd in verschillende biomoleculen, of worden gebruikt voor verschillende metabolische functies. Waar is de logica in te denken dat de plant deze in die laatste week van flushing 'opmaakt', om te voorkomen dat je ze rookt? Al het N P K Fe Mg Ca enz. is nog steeds daar. 4. Voor de argumentatie zeggen we dat we het laatste punt weerleggen door te suggereren dat deze mineralen in hun 'rauwe vorm' 'sterker' of 'vieser' zullen smaken in de vorm van pyrolytische afbraakproducten (gevormd wanneer wiet wordt verbrand) dan artefacten van grotere biomoleculen waarvan deze mineralen/macrovoedingsstoffen nu een onderdeel zijn, bijvoorbeeld gefosforyleerd PO43-. Zelfs als dit het geval was, correleert het nog steeds niet met de mythe, aangezien de transportstroom in de xylemelementen in minuten wordt gemeten, niet in een week. D.w.z. een PO43- molecuul wacht niet een week in deze vaten voordat het wordt getransporteerd en gemodificeerd. 5. Als er enige waarheid in deze mythe zat, zouden planten die in de grond zijn gekweekt altijd slechter smaken dan planten die in hydro zijn gekweekt. Waarom? Omdat grond duidelijk geen inert medium is dat je een week kunt flushen. En een plant KAN niet onderscheiden tussen een PO43- molecuul dat uit de grond komt en dat van een PO43- molecuul dat uit een hydro-oplossing komt (wat ook een andere mythe ontkracht, maar dat laten we voor nu). 6. Zijn er studies die dubbelblinde proeven hebben uitgevoerd om te onderzoeken of geflusht wiet 'zoeter' smaakt dan ongeflusht wiet? Weer, peer-reviewed papers zijn nodig. En het hoeft geen wiet te zijn, het kan ook aardbeien of een ander soort fruit zijn. 7. Wat is het voorgestelde mechanisme ter ondersteuning van deze mythe, en hoe is het consistent met de fundamentele plantbiologie? 8. Hoe verhoogt het uithongeren van de plant in de laatste week de thc-productie in de trichomen? Papers? 9. Gegeven dat, onder bepaalde omstandigheden, gestreste planten bepaalde verdedigingsverbindingen verhogen, maar ze zullen vrijwel zeker minder bloeiwijzegewicht per watt licht produceren. Groei wordt altijd geremd onder stress - niet bevorderd. Voedingsstoffentekort is een vorm van stress. Ik zoek naar peer-reviewed papers die anders suggereren. Degenen onder jullie die vastgeroest zitten in jullie gewoonten, ieder zijn eigen en veel succes. Degenen die bereid zijn hun opvattingen te veranderen in het licht van nieuw bewijs, of het gebrek daaraan, wees klaar voor verhoogde opbrengsten door die hongerige dames tot het moment dat je ze kapt goed te voeden.
ZHunterZz3
ZHunterZz3 gecommentarieerd6y ago
@NorthernFrostCannabis, het lijkt erop dat de verkeerde informatie over flushen nooit zal eindigen.
Gayek
Gayek gecommentarieerd6y ago
Geweldig artikel, nuttig om te weten, ik spoel altijd 20 dagen voor de oogst, eerst 10 dagen Ripen en dan 10 dagen water.
Taito
Taito gecommentarieerd6y ago
Ik denk dat dit een artikel is dat elke cannabisliefhebber moet lezen :ok_hand: Heel erg bedankt nogmaals :clap:
smearCase
smearCase gecommentarieerd3y ago
Dit slaat nergens op. Hoe spoel je planten die in de grond zijn gekweekt? Dat doe je niet, omdat zoiets niet bestaat.
seedgrower
seedgrower gecommentarieerd6y ago
Geweldige info